Sign in

The Plont plant library

Arbi (Taro) vs Elephant Ear

Compare Colocasia esculenta with Alocasia macrorrhizos. Both appear in the indoor category of Plont’s catalog. Use their recorded differences to prepare questions for your nursery.

Growing conditions side by side

Swipe across the table to compare both plants.

Draft catalog comparison of Arbi (Taro) and Elephant Ear
Catalog fieldArbi (Taro)Elephant Ear
Botanical nameColocasia esculentaAlocasia macrorrhizos
Hindi name (draft)अरबीएलिफैंट इयर
Other catalog namestaro, colocasia, eddoe, arvigiant taro, man kachu, alocasia
Light starting pointPartial sun (3–5 hours)Medium indirect light
Approximate growing range15–36°C15–35°C
Catalog care estimateEasyModerate

What differs for your space?

Arbi (Taro) is listed for partial sun (3–5 hours), while Elephant Ear is listed for medium indirect light. Record how many hours of direct sun your intended spot receives and confirm the match locally.

Arbi (Taro) has a recorded range of 15–36°C; Elephant Ear is listed at 15–35°C. The recorded ranges overlap from 15 to 35°C. That overlap compares the draft entries; it is not proof that either plant will suit the spot.

Arbi (Taro) is marked easy, compared with moderate for Elephant Ear. Treat that as a planning estimate, then ask which care tasks each plant needs in your conditions.

Make the next care decision at the pot.

A comparison cannot set a watering date. Check moisture first: pot size, growing mix and current weather change how quickly a container dries. Record what you notice and decide when to check again.

Read the RHS guide to watering containers for general container advice, or use Plont’s plant observation checklist. The RHS source supports this general advice; it does not verify the species-specific draft values above.

Keep exploring

A place for the plant you choose.

Save a plant and keep track of your care checks in Plont. Free includes two active plants with reminders. Sign in is required; identification has usage limits.